I'm really just a two-legged, upright lemming.

May212012

Who has two thumbs and is on page 23 of 56 of this Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement?

Entity #554 of 1418?

This guy, right here.

Work Receiver

May152012

middlemanagementlivingthedream:

receiver:

(via Corporate B.S. Generator)

Ah, I see you’ve been sitting in on my meetings…

I’ve been scripting your meetings, dude.

Middle Management receiver dilbert comic work yup

May32012

How not to respond to show-cause orders; or, How To Make the Attorneys Who Suck List; or, How to Fail at Helping Your Client

Court: It is hereby ORDERED that [redacted], attorney for the Plaintiff, show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the court’s Rule 26(f) Order.
Attorney Response: COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned attorney, and files this Rule 26 (F) Report as follows: 1. The Plaintiff adopts the Rule 26 (F) Report previously filed by the Defendant.
Court: It is hereby ORDERED that [redacted] respond directly to the court’s show cause order no later than February 14, 2012. The filing of February 10, 2012 is insufficient
Attorney Response: COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned attorney, and files this his response to this Honorable Court’s Show Cause Order as follows: That the undersigned attorney filed a Rule 26 (f) report adopting the Defendant’s Rule 26 (f) Report that was previously filed. The undersigned attorney avers that he mistakenly believed that merely adopting the Defendant’s Rule 26 (f) Report would be sufficient. That a Uniform Scheduling Order has been issued adopting the Rule 26 (f) Report previously filed by the Defendant. That the undersigned attorney assures this Honorable Court that he will strictly adhere to the Uniform Scheduling Order and all other Orders made by this Honorable Court. That the undersigned attorney profusely apologizes for any inconvenience he may have caused this Honorable Court.
Court: Before the court is the Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion. This case has been marked by the failure of the Plaintiff’s attorney to comply with the orders of the court, to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Scheduling Order, and now his failures to comply with the discovery requirements of the FRCP. On February 14, 2012, Plaintiff’s lawyer filed a response to an earlier order of the court by apologizing for failure to comply and assuring the Court that he would strictly adhere to the Uniform Scheduling Order and all other orders made by the court. Because of his failure to live up to his assurances, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: Plaintiff is given until May 2, 2012, to show cause, if any there be, why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Advising the court as to whether he consents to the Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time will not suffice; his response must show why his continued inactions should not cause the court to conclude that the Plaintiff has abandoned his case. (As further set out.)
Attorney Response: COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned attorney, and files this his response to this Honorable Court’s Show Cause Order as follows: 1. That the Defendant has, as of this date, complied with all discovery requests by the Plaintiff.
RECEIVER: What the hell kind of response is this last one?!? If Judge doesn't sanction this guy, I'm gonna need a drink!

work attorneys who suck dot com Receiver sanctions

April252012

Coffee Punch:

1 quart chocolate milk
1 half gallon ice cream (they recommend either choc/coffee/vanilla)
2 quarts cold coffee

Little ol’ ladies at work have started sharing recipes, since I cook things and bring them in when we do work things.

How sweet.

coffee punch coffee punch recipe work Receiver

April242012

What my last 38 minutes has consisted of:

Upload a Batch (cont’d)

3 of 7

In OTCnet Offline, a CCS, or a CCLO/CCO with Batch Uploader permissions can close and upload batches. When a CCS closes a batch(es) in Offline mode, the batch(es) automatically changes to Approved status, and is therefore is eligible for upload to OTCnet Online, where it is forwarded for processing. However, when a CCLO/CCO with Batch Uploader permission closes and uploads a batch, the batch remains in a Closed status. In this scenario a CCS will need to approve a batch in Batch Management of OTCnet Online. This is used when an agency prefers to use the online approval process, and the terminal is configured to allow for uploading batches that have not yet been approved by a CCS. Unless granted a Batch Approver/Batch Uploader permission as a CCO or CCLO, approving and uploading batches in offline mode can only be performed by a CCS.

Based on permissions granted, a user can only view the batches that he/she has access to view. If a terminal is configured to allow for uploading of batches and Supervisor approval is not required, active batches that are in Closed, Approved, Sent, and Send Error status will display. If a terminal is configured to require Supervisor approval for the terminal then only batches with Approved or Send Error display and are eligible for upload.

Training work Receiver

March122012

I think I will have moved almost 100 pieces of courthouse furniture before the day is over.

Ugh work

February82012

So the court requires a response from a pro se plaintiff as to why he hasn’t paid his filing fee, for his lawsuit. Below is his response.

Clerk,

Due to a complete breakdown in gov. staff, @ apparently all levels. (A response was previously made or addressed.) Please dismiss this action sincerely. This plaintiff is tired of reading this courts childish responses. Tired also of supporting this type of malevolent gov. So please dismiss this case & wave all fees.

This court has done nothing to merit any garnishment whatsoever in its frivolous childish responses.

Sincerely

Pro Se [Redacted]

work inmate response to judge Receiver

February22012

The makings of today’s cheese dip for today’s lunch party.

Cheese-product, Rotel, bacon, chopped spinach*, cream cheese*, and I’m using Fritos scoops to eat it. Or a spoon.

*Not pictured

Receiver work food cheese dip

January252012

Just spoke with four employees of the USDC, Southern District of NY, Moynihan Courthouse.

Y’all got some funny accents.

BaffledinBrooklyn Section9 TLOTH work Receiver

January182012

inapposite (adjective)

not appropriate or pertinent; unsuitable

Judge just whipped this word out in an order to an attorney. This attorney has filed several motions to reconsider. Reminds me of Demi Moore in A Few Good Men where she strenously objects…

work Receiver inapposite

December272011

Why do attorneys wait until 430pm to bring in TROs?

Judge aint ruling on them til tomorrow—this strategy aint making you any friends, suckas.

Work Receiver

December232011

So I’m still stuck at work…

I’m glad I have a job;
There aren’t any attorneys working;
There aren’t any judges working;
There isn’t any work for me to do;
There aren’t any tumblrs tumblring (bums!);
I’m watching Highlander: Endgame at work, on Netflix.
And drinking diet coke.

You needed this update Receiver work

November302011

OMG...I'd hate to have to transcribe this:

Q: Such as?
A: First, was their, I guess, their physical proximity to the -- to the mill fence line, their -- their -- their -- the location of their home -- ... --is in a -- a -- very low lying region... The -- and -- the -- the -- Mr. -- Mr. --I guess...
Q: What did its low lying nature have to do with...?
A: The -- the -- the -- in -- in and of itself, it -- it -- it was an element of -- of the overall -- of -- of the overall unique...
Q: You can answer.
A: Mr. [Redacted] approached [Redacted] with a claim and -- and we responded to that -- to that claim to -- to -- to determine -- determine what the nature of the claim was.